Reminds me of what Ronald Regan said to Jimmy Carter during one of their debates. “You are intitled to your own opion but not your own facts” #PeaceMarshall
CNN pushes this mantra but many believe they promote fake news
When scientists evaluate published research we are more interested in evidence than in conclusions. In fact, the same evidence may lead scientific readers to different conclusions. That’s not surprising as in the real world no research project is able to consider all the theoretically possible evidence. Readers may, in fact, have other evidence. Or they may detect faults in authors’ interpretations.
I think this is a good thing. Considering the evidence allows competent critiques to be made and encourages knowledge to advance.
However, it annoys me that when we move outside the scientific environment we have to deal with situations where evidence may rarely be considered. People indulge in debating conclusions often with no regard to evidence. In fact, debaters seem to rely more on the real or perceived authority of their sources to support or discredit an argument, than on the evidence.
View original post 1,092 more words